|
PHILOSOPHY OF SOCIAL SCIENCE
Group 1 (1) (rounded mean of 4.5) (median, mode)
London School of Economics (4.5, 4.5)
Group 2 (2-5) (rounded mean of 4.0) (median, mode)
Duke University (4, 4)
Oxford University (4, 4.25)
University of California, Irvine (4, 3.5)
University of Wisconsin, Madison (4, 4)
Group 3 (6-13) (rounded mean of 3.5)
Columbia University (3.75, 3.5)
Princeton University (3.75, 4)
Rutgers University, New Brunswick (3.5, 3.5)
Stanford University (4, 4.25)
University of Arizona (3.25, 3.25)
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (3, 3.25)
University of Pennsylvania (3.5, 3.5)
University of Washington, Seattle (3.75, 4)
Group 4 (14-32) (rounded mean of 3.0)
Australian National University (3.5, 4)
Birkbeck College, University of London (3, 3.25)
Cambridge University (3, 3.5)
Carnegie-Mellon University (3, 3)
City University of New York Graduate Center (2.5, 2)
Cornell University (2.5, 2.75)
Florida State University (2.75, 2.75)
Indiana University, Bloomington (2.5, 2.5)
New York University (3, 3)
St. Louis University (3.25, 3.5)
University of Bristol (2.75, 3.25)
University of California, Berkeley (3, 3.25)
University of California, San Diego (3, 2.5)
University of California, Santa Cruz (3.25, 3.5)
University of Exeter (3.5, 3.5)
*University of Kentucky
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (3, 2.5)
University of Pittsburgh (3, 2.75)
University of Western Ontario (2.5, 3.25)
* inserted by Board
# based on 2004 results, in some cases with modest adjustments by the Advisory Board to reflect changes in staff in the interim
Evaluators: James Bohman, Cristina Bicchieri, Margaret Gilbert, Ron Mallon, Alan Nelson, Alexander Rosenberg, Paul Roth, Brian Skyrms, Alison Wylie.
Remember: evaluators were not permitted to evaluate either their own department or the department from which they received their highest degree (PhD, DPhil, sometimes the BPhil).
Editor’s note: Some philosophers of social science have raised questions about whether this pool of evaluators was fairly representative of the field. There is pertinent discussion of the issue here: http://leiterreports.typepad.com/blog/2007/01/philosophy_of_s.html
|
