|
MATHEMATICAL LOGIC
Group 1 (1) (rounded mean of 5.0) (median, mode)
City University of New York Graduate Center (5, 5)
Group 2 (2-3) (rounded mean of 4.5) (median, mode)
Carnegie-Mellon University (5, 5)
Stanford University (4.5, 4.75)
Group 3 (4-15) (rounded mean of 4.0) (median, mode)
Harvard University (4, 4.5)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (4, 4)
New York University (4.5, 5)
Ohio State University (4, 4)
Princeton University (4, 4)
University of Bristol (4, 4)
University of California, Berkeley (4, 3)
University of California, Irvine (4.25, 5)
University of California, Los Angeles (4.25, 5)
University of Melbourne (4, 5)
University of Notre Dame (4, 4.25)
University of Pittsburgh (3.5, 3)
Group 4 (16-31) (rounded mean of 3.5) (median, mode)
Cambridge University (3, 3)
Columbia University (3.75, 4)
Cornell University (4, 4.25)
King’s College, London (3.25, 3.25)
Monash University (4, 3.5)
Oxford University (4, 4)
University of Alberta (3, 3)
University of Calgary (3.5, 3)
University of California, Davis (3.5, 3.25)
University of Illinois, Chicago (3, 3)
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (3.5, 3.5)
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis-St. Paul (3.5, 3.5)
University of Sheffield (3.5, 4)
University of St. Andrews/University of Stirling Joint Program (3.5, 3.5)
University of Toronto (3, 3)
University of Western Ontario (3.5, 4)
Group 5 (32-40) (rounded mean of 3.0) (median, mode)
Boston University (3, 2.5)
Indiana University, Bloomington (3, 3)
Simon Fraser University (2.75, 2.75)
*University of Adelaide
University of Arizona (3, 2.75)
University of California, Santa Barbara (2.5, 2.5)
University of Connecticut, Storrs (2.75, 2.5)
University of Maryland, College Park (3.5, 2)
University of Southern California (3, 3)
* inserted by Board
# based on 2004 results, in some cases with modest adjustments by the Advisory Board to reflect changes in staff in the interim
Note: Much work in mathematical logic goes on in Mathematics and Computer Science departments. Students primarily interested in Mathematical Logic would do well to explore those programs also, as well as specialized interdisciplinary programs like Berkeley's Program in Logic & Methodology of Science or Amsterdam's Institute for Logic, Language & Computation.
Evaluators: Aldo Antonelli, Jeffrey Barrett, J.C. Beall, Graeme Forbes, Warren Goldfarb, Anil Gupta, Volker Halbach, John Kearns, Frederick Kroon, Penelope Maddy, Calvin Normore, Peter Pagin, Graham Priest, Gabriel Uzquiano.
Remember: evaluators were not permitted to evaluate either their own department or the department from which they received their highest degree (PhD, DPhil, sometimes the BPhil).
|
