|
DECISION, RATIONAL CHOICE, AND GAME THEORY
Group 1 (1-2) (mean of 4.5)(median, mode)
University of California, Irvine (4.5, 5)
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (4.75, 5)
Group 2 (3-4) (mean of 4.0)(median, mode)
London School of Economics (4, 4.25)
University of Pennsylvania (4, 3.75)
Group 3 (5-9) (mean of 3.5)(median, mode)
Australian National University (3.5, 3.5)
Carnegie-Mellon University (4, 4.5)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (4, 4)
Oxford University (3.5, 3.5)
Rutgers University, New Brunswick (3.5, 4)
Group 4 (10-27) (mean of 3.0)(median, mode)
Arizona State University (3.25, 3.25)
Brown University (2.5, 2.75)
City University of New York Graduate Center (3, 3.5)
Columbia University (3, 3)
Harvard University (3, 3)
Indiana University, Bloomington (3, 3.5)
New York University (3, 3.25)
Princeton University (2.5, 2.5)
Stanford University (3.25, 3.25)
University of Bristol (3.25, 4)
University of California, Berkeley (3.5, 3.5)
University of Missouri, Columbia (3.5, 3.5)
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (3, 3.25)
University of Sydney (3, 3)
University of Texas, Austin (3, 3)
University of Toronto (2.5, 2.5)
University of Western Ontario (2.75, 4)
University of Wisconsin, Madison (3, 3)
Note: Work in these areas cuts across problems in philosophy of science, epistemology, and political philosophy.
Evaluators: Brad Armendt, Cristina Bicchieri, David Christensen, Ken Gemes, Anthony Gillies, Alan Hajek, William Harper, Christopher Hitchcock, Jim Joyce, Wlodek Rabinowicz, Mathias Risse, David Schmidtz, Brian Skyrms.
Remember: evaluators were not permitted to evaluate either their own department or the department from which they received their highest degree (PhD, DPhil, sometimes the BPhil).
|
