|
DECISION, RATIONAL CHOICE, AND GAME THEORY
Group 1 (1) (mean of 5.0) (median, mode)
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (5, 5)
Group 2 (2) (mean of 4.5) (median, mode)
University of California, Irvine (4.5, 4.5 & 5)
Group 3 (3-4) (mean of 4.0) (median, mode)
London School of Economics (4, 3 & 4.5)
University of Pennsylvania (4, 3 & 4 & 4.5)
Group 4 (5-9) (mean of 3.5) (median, mode)
Australian National University (3.5, 4)
Carnegie-Mellon University (4.5, 4.5 & 5)
Columbia University (4, 4)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (4, 4.5)
Oxford University (3.5, 4.5)
Group 5 (10-19) (mean of 3.0) (median, mode)
Arizona State University (3, 3)
Boston University (3, 1 & 3 & 3.5 & 4)
Indiana University, Bloomington (3, 3 & 4)
Princeton University (3, 4)
Stanford University (3.5, 3.5 & 4)
University of California, Berkeley (3, 4)
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign (3.25, 4)
University of Missouri, Columbia (3.25, 4)
University of Pittsburgh (3, 1 & 2 & 4)
University of Western Ontario (3, 3.5 & 4)
Note: Work in these areas cuts across problems in philosophy of science, epistemology, and political philosophy.
Evaluators: Cristina Bicchieri, David Christensen, Jules Coleman, Anthony Gillies, Alan Hajek, Daniel Garber, Jim Joyce, Marc Lange, Wlodek Rabinowicz, Mathias Risse, David Schmidtz, Brian Skyrms.
Remember: evaluators were not permitted to evaluate either their own department or the department from which they received their highest degree (PhD, DPhil, sometimes the BPhil).
|
