|
PHILOSOPHY OF COGNITIVE SCIENCE
Group 1 (1-2) (mean of 4.5) (median, mode)
Rutgers University, New Brunswick (5, 5)
University of California, San Diego (4.5, 4 & 5)
Group 2 (3-8) (mean of 4.0) (median, mode)
Australian National University (4, 4)
New York University (4, 4)
University of Arizona (3.75, 4.5)
University of Edinburgh (4, 4)
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (4.25, 4.5 & 5)
Washington University, St. Louis (4, 4)
Group 3 (9-11) (mean of 3.5) (median, mode)
Oxford University (3.5, 3.5 & 4)
University of California, Berkeley (4, 4)
University of Maryland, College Park (3.75, 3.5)
Group 4 (12-27) (mean of 3.0 ) (median, mode)
Columbia University (3, 3.5)
Duke University (3, 3.5)
Harvard University (3, 3.5)
Indiana University, Bloomington (3, 3)
King's College, London (2.75, 2.5 & 3.5)
University College London (3, 3.5)
* University of Adelaide
University of Bristol (3.5, 4)
* University of Cincinnati
University of Connecticut, Storrs (3, 2 & 3)
University of Massachusetts, Amherst (3, 3.5)
University of Sheffield (3, 3)
University of Texas, Austin (3, 3)
University of Toronto (3.5, 3.5)
University of Warwick (3.5, 3.5)
University of Wisconsin, Madison (3, 2.5 & 3 & 4)
* inserted by Board
# based on 2004 results, in some cases with modest adjustments by the Advisory Board to reflect changes in staff in the interim
Evaluators: William Bechtel, Jose Bermudez, David Braddon-Mitchell, Alex Byrne, Peter Carruthers, David Chalmers, Tamar Gendler, Alvin Goldman, George Graham, Gilbert Harman, Benjamin Hellie, David Hilbert, Sean Kelly, Patricia Kitcher, Joe Lau, Stephen Laurence, Peter Ludlow, Shaun Nichols, Alva Noe, David Papineau, Diana Raffman, Richard Samuels, Kim Sterelny, Stephen Stich, Michael Tye, Robert Wilson.
Remember: evaluators were not permitted to evaluate either their own department or the department from which they received their highest degree (PhD, DPhil, sometimes the BPhil).
|
