|
Note: Be sure to see, under “Advice on Choosing Programs,” the discussion of the choice between Philosophy and History & Philosophy of Science programs.
GENERAL PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE (excluding philosophy of the specific sciences)
Group 1 (1) (mean of 4.5)(median, mode)
University of Pittsburgh (4.5, 5)
Group 2 (2-11) (mean of 4.0)(median, mode)
Carnegie-Mellon University (4, 4)
Columbia University (4, 4.25)
London School of Economics (4, 4)
Oxford University (4, 4.5)
Rutgers University, New Brunswick (4, 3.5)
University of California, Irvine (4.5, 4)
University of California, San Diego (4, 4)
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (4.25, 4.25)
University of Western Ontario (4, 4)
University of Wisconsin, Madison (4, 4)
Group 3 (12-22) (mean of 3.5)(median, mode)
Australian National University (3, 3)
Cambridge University (3.5, 4)
Harvard University (3.5, 3.75)
Indiana University, Bloomington (3.5, 3.5)
New York University (3.5, 4)
Stanford University (3.5, 3)
University of Bristol (3.5, 4)
University of Maryland, College Park (3.5, 3.5)
University of Notre Dame (3.5, 3.5)
University of Sydney (3.75, 4)
University of Toronto (3.5, 3.75)
Group 4 (23-44) (mean of 3.0)(median, mode)
Boston University (2.5, 3)
Cornell University (3, 3)
Duke University (3, 3)
Florida State University (2.5, 3)
King’s College, London (3, 3)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (3, 3)
Princeton University (3.5, 4)
University of Arizona (3, 3)
University of British Columbia (3, 3)
University of California, Berkeley (3, 3)
University of California, Davis (2.75, 3)
University of Exeter (3, 3)
University of Illinois, Chicago (3, 3)
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign (2.5, 2.5)
University of Leeds (3, 3)
University of Miami (3, 3)
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis-St. Paul (3, 3)
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (3, 3)
University of Pennsylvania (3, 2.75)
University of South Carolina (3, 2)
University of Texas, Austin (3, 3.5)
University of Washington, Seattle (3, 3)
* inserted by Board
# based on 2004 results, in some cases with modest adjustments by the Advisory Board to reflect changes in staff in the interim
Evaluators: Roger Ariew, Jeffrey Barrett, William Bechtel, Alexander Bird, Craig Callender, David Christensen, Mark Colyvan, John Dupre, Marc Ereshefsky, Ken Gemes, Peter Godfrey-Smith, Paul Griffiths, Alan Hajek, William Harper, Christopher Hitchcock, Jim Joyce, James Ladyman, Barry Loewer, John Norton, David Papineau, Huw Price, Alexander Rosenberg, Paul Roth, Laura Ruetsche, Howard Sankey, Simon Saunders, Jonathan Schaffer, Lawrence Sklar, Brian Skyrms, Elliott Sober, Kyle Stanford, Michael Strevens, J.D. Trout, Eric Watkins, William Wimsatt, Alison Wylie.
Remember: evaluators were not permitted to evaluate either their own department or the department from which they received their highest degree (PhD, DPhil, sometimes the BPhil).
|
