|
MATHEMATICAL LOGIC
Group 1 (1-3) (mean of 4.5)
Carnegie-Mellon University (5.0)
City University of New York Graduate Center (4.5)
Stanford University (4.75)
Group 2 (4-9) (mean of 4.0)
New York University (4.25)
Oxford University (4.5)
Princeton University (4.0)
University of California, Irvine (4.0)
University of California, Los Angeles (4.25)
University of Pittsburgh (4.0)
Group 3 (10-16) (mean of 3.5)
Columbia University (4.0)
Harvard University (3.5)
Massachussetts Institute of Technology (4.0)
Ohio State University (4.0)
University of Melbourne (3.5)
University of Notre Dame (3.5)
University of Toronto (4.0)
Group 4 (17-21) (mean of 3.0)
Cornell University (3.5)
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (3.25)
University of St. Andrews (3.0)
University of Texas, Austin (3.0)
University of Western Ontario (3.0)
In the judgment of the Advisory Board, the
following programs that were not part of the survey ought to be
considered by students interested in this area: University of Adelaide.
Note: Much work in mathematical
logic goes on in Mathematics and Computer Science departments.
Students primarily interested in Mathematical Logic would do well
to explore those programs also, as well as specialized interdisciplinary
programs like Berkeley 's Program in Logic & Methodology of
Science or Amsterdam 's Institute for Logic, Language & Computation.
Evaluators: Aldo Antonelli,
J.C. Beall, J. Michael Dunn, John Etchemendy, Graeme Forbes, Warren
Goldfarb, Anil Gupta, Volker Halbach, John Kearns, Michael Kremer,
Frederick Kroon, Calvin Normore, Graham Priest, Gabriel Uzquiano,
Jose Zalabardo. (Remember: Evaluators were not permitted to evaluate
their own department or the department from which they received
their graduate degree.)
|
