|
DECISION, RATIONAL CHOICE,
AND GAME THEORY
Group 1 (1-2) (mean of 4.5)
University of California, Irvine (5.0)
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (4.5)
Group 2 (3-4) (mean of 4.0)
Carnegie-Mellon University (4.5)
London School of Economics (4.5)
Group 3 (5-10) (mean of 3.5)
Massachussetts Institute of Technology (3.5)
Oxford University (4.0)
Princeton University (4.0)
Syracuse University (3.0)
University of Pennsylvania (4.0)
University of Wisconsin, Madison (4.0)
Group 4 (11-21) (mean of 3.0)
Arizona State University (3.0)
Australian National University (3.0)
Columbia University (3.0)
Harvard University (4.0)
Indiana University, Bloomington (3.0)
Rutgers University, New Brunswick (3.5)
University of Arizona (2.75)
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign (3.75)
University of Missouri, Columbia (3.0)
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (3.5)
University of Western Ontario (3.5)
Also Notable (median of 3.0): Simon
Fraser University; King's College, London; University of California,
Berkeley; University of Pittsburgh;
Note: Work in these areas
cuts across problems in philosophy of science, epistemology, and
political philosophy.
In addition, the aggregated faculties of the
colleges making up the University of London received a rounded
mean score of 4.0 and a median score of 4.5.
Evaluators: Brad Armendt,
Cristina Bicchieri, David Christensen, Anthony Gillies, William
Harper, Jim Joyce, Peter Menzies, Mathias Risse, David Schmidtz,
Brian Skyrms. (Remember: Evaluators were not permitted to evaluate
their own department or the department from which they received
their graduate degree.)
|
